The Plymouth City Airport site might benefit from council protection to prevent houses being built, it was reiterated at our public meeting last night.
Viable, the group fighting to reopen the airport, held a packed meeting at Future Inn where Cllr Ian Bowyer, cabinet member for finance, was invited to speak and answer questions.
In front of around 100 people he said Plymouth City Council supported the idea of the airport, so long as there was a viable plan to go forward.
"We are trying to protect the site by removing it from the Seaton and Derriford Action Plan for future expansion," he said.
"We have taken it out. It will remain categorised as an airport."
Sutton Harbour Group (SHG), which operated the airport on a 150-year-lease from Plymouth City Council, shut it in December saying it was not economically sustainable
The company's lease allows it to sell the land if it closes the airport. The council would take 75 per cent of the proceeds.
In August, the council's Cabinet backed the closure after SHG had produced two consultants' reports which said no one wanted to run the airport or flights, and not enough businesses used the airstrip to make it economically viable.
A campaign group, Viable, hit back with a business plan to reopen and run the airport.
Cllr Bowyer said: "We need a mature and informed debate on the matter and I feel many people are only getting half the picture on this. I will take messages back to the council and we will talk to Viable via the chair, Raoul Witherall.
"I don't want to see houses built all over the site," he added.
Viable's vision is to extend the runway. They are running a petition in support of the airport which now has 13,000 signatures.
But Cllr Bowyer said: "This is not a bucket and spade airport and it never will be – the runway isn't long enough. An airport is important to the city but it has to be viable. I cannot make any sweeping promises – our financial position is tight."
He said the council could not raise the £30million needed to invest back into the airport. This would mean raising council tax by a third for everyone in the city, he said.
Full story
here